whatthe75 wrote:
If your referring to most of the hypnotists on here as "amateurs",having a piece of paper and a two or three week course under your belt does not mean you know more than anyone else.Most of the very big names in hypnosis and ones that have started their own succesfull fileds have no qualifications or training whatsoever.Different language and different approaches should be used for each individual,it doesn't just count for difference between adults and children.
Never said anything about papers. Training doesn't always have to come from a teacher, but most who do hypnotism have atleast attempted to do some homework on the matter. I agree, experience and doing is often much more important. Never quantified anything about the people on this site since there is a mix of both experienced and inexperienced. However, for all intents and purposes, many on this site are technically "amateurs" since they are not making a living from being being a hypnotist, or are otherwise maintaining attempting "professional" service. This is not to speak ill of anyone, but rather remind that hypnotism is something which is always being practiced, and by nature of that practice, mistakes do happen. My response was directed primarily toward your argument of Erickson's work with children, as opposed to the work of those on an adult site. No other conclusions were described, and we are, for the most part in agreement on those points reached, however they do not really relate to my response.
whatthe75 wrote:
so do adults - its just not as obvious.Children are not in a constant state of shock,they are in a state of learning and wonder.
Again, we are in agreement, but this really depends how one defines shock. The point I was making is that the minds of children are often more susceptible to accepting greater changes than adults because of this state.
whatthe75 wrote:
You cant force a change.
Technically, you are correct, although suggestions which insist upon total submission, and obedience come close enough. But again, you miss the point completely.
whatthe75 wrote:
Again,exactly the same for all adults.
Which is exactly why care should always be taken when using things which are not designed for the user, or at the very least, someone of a similar demographic/philosophy. Unless you identified as a woman, you would not listen to a file designed for women to help boost confidence because the effect of listening to that file, while not being in the targeted audience could have unwanted effects. Same deal here.
whatthe75 wrote:
Again same for all the adults.
Yes, but to a lesser extent. Not talking about merely learning here, but instead how much of what we learn becomes part of who we are. Talking about working with schema and concepts here, not just knowledge. Children just tend to be much more able to change their views and understanding of things than adults. This is why the teaching of language, high level science and maths at a younger age is so important, adults just have more difficulty adopting these concepts into their being. Same goes for philosophies. Dried clay is just not as malleable as moist clay, this is not saying that the dried clay cannot become rehydrated and reshaped, just that it often takes more effort.
whatthe75 wrote:
I hope your not referring to mentally unstable as meaning all children.
Obviously not. Was drawing a link between working with mentally unstable adults being similar to working with children, supporting the stance that it often requires a special approach designed specifically for that individual. Nothing else.