Deemreo wrote:Yes, I am recording my own files... suggestions? I'm not sure I follow you.
It's not that I need help making or modifying the file, but rather if the concept at all is a good one, or if I should stick to just using individual files for each effect I want.
Hello Deemreo,
Interesting concept. At first I was thinking that you may be causing problems if you put the laundry list of changes into the file. But you cleared that up when you said that you only put in one change and are waiting for the effects of that change before adding others. That sounds like the right approach.
I believe people can be hypnotized through text. Reading a book can often take people into a type of trance. However, I think that effective hypnosis through text can require many pages of engaging text. For example, pick up a book in which you don't care for the story or the style of writing and you are unlikely to be able to really get into the story.
It was unclear to me how you went about this project. Did you start with a recorded Mp3 file that tells you you will respond to the suggestions you place in the master file? If that is not what you did, I would suggest you do so. Then I would listen to that file for several weeks before even looking at the master file. That file will need to take effect before you can expect effects from the master file.
How well this works is likely to depend not only on how you constructed the master text file but just as importantly on how you constructed the file that prepared you for the text file as well as your preparation and training in getting ready to use the text file.
Not that you need my help in how to construct those files, but you might consider placing a few paragraphs of text in the master file that have an abbreviated induction that you read before you get to the suggestions in the text file. Just enough to call up the the frame of mind you are in when listening to the recorded file that instructs you that you respond to the words in the master text file.
Construct the recorded file in such a way that it installs an additional trigger beyond just reading or thinking of the file. A trigger that uses something in the abbreviated induction. Use some of the same words and phrases in the text file as in the recorded file. Then in the recorded file you may say something like....
"You are hearing my words and they take you into trance. Hearing the words XXXXX takes you into trance. You hear the words XXXXX and what you hear imediately after causes lasting changes in you. You read the master file and it takes you into trance. Reading the words XXXXX you hear them in my voice. You hear the words XXX in my voice when you read them as though I were speaking them to you. You read XXXXX and you go into trance. What you read imediately after reading XXXXX causes lasting changes in you....."
Of courser I have no way of knowing. You may have already constructed the file similarly to this, but that is my suggestion.
Then, as already suggested, you should listen to the recorded file for a few weeks before ever going to the master text file. If you don't mind me suggesting one of my own files, you might find my file, Sarnoga - G File, to be complimentary to your recorded file. It might help the results if you listened to your own file once each day for two days. The third day listen to G File instead, the fourth day start over with your file and repeat the process for a few weeks.
As mentioned at the begining of this post, you have an interesting concept. You may be able to get it to work and if you do it sounds like it will yield many benefits. It is also possible it will not work, but accomplishing such a task is not an easy or simple matter and just because you are slow in seeing results from the first go, doesn't mean the concept is flawed.
Consider using the suggestions above if that is not something you have already done. Stick with the recorded file for several weeks before attempting to use the master text file. Then when starting to use the master text file continue to use your recorded file a couple times a week.
You may very well find yourself achiving success. If not try tinkering with things a bit, perhaps find ways to improve the recorded file, or the recorded file and the text file which should have some common threads. Then try again. Such a file sounds challenging. Do not assume you will get it right on the first try or give up if you don't.
If I find 10,000 ways something won't work, I haven't failed. I am not discouraged, because every wrong attempt discarded is another step forward.
Thomas A. Edison, Encyclopaedia Britannica
US inventor (1847 - 1931)
Regards,
Sarnoga.