Experiment Conclusion and observed results, (SUMMERY)
Posted: February 6th, 2014, 9:26 am
Question 1: How does a file containing a unique, and unintelligible language affect those who do not understand it?
Question 2: Can suggestive programming be made active by teaching someone who was exposed to the unintelligible suggestive programming the language to the point of becoming aware of it's meaning?
Question 3: Is exposing a subject to the unintelligible suggestive programming then teaching them the languages meaning ,then re exposing them to the suggestive programming more effective than teaching them the language first, then exposure?
Hypothesis omitted(Relevance)
Procedure omitted(Contains Intellectual Property)
Observations omitted(Personal privacy of subjects)
Conclusion 1: When exposed to the unintelligible suggestive programming the subjects entered a mild hypnotic state relative to their determined hypnotic susceptibility as determined by previous testing. The subjects did not preform the programmed actions at this time. Two subjects experienced an enthusiastic curiosity towards the material in question.
Conclusion 2: When exposed to the unintelligible suggestive programming then given access to the index of meanings, the subjects experienced frustration and an unwillingness to preform the suggested action. The procedure was altered and a new language devised, The experiment repeated however this time the index was introduced as a regular suggestive program. Over the course of time the subjects saw gradual activation of programmed behaviors as the new language was becoming intuitively understood without unaltered subject awareness.
Conclusion 3:In regards to Procedure two the process of re exposure is more effective. During post exposure interviews all subjects stated "Drawing the commands from memory and hearing 'was' Way more powerful than hearing it alone"
Question 2: Can suggestive programming be made active by teaching someone who was exposed to the unintelligible suggestive programming the language to the point of becoming aware of it's meaning?
Question 3: Is exposing a subject to the unintelligible suggestive programming then teaching them the languages meaning ,then re exposing them to the suggestive programming more effective than teaching them the language first, then exposure?
Hypothesis omitted(Relevance)
Procedure omitted(Contains Intellectual Property)
Observations omitted(Personal privacy of subjects)
Conclusion 1: When exposed to the unintelligible suggestive programming the subjects entered a mild hypnotic state relative to their determined hypnotic susceptibility as determined by previous testing. The subjects did not preform the programmed actions at this time. Two subjects experienced an enthusiastic curiosity towards the material in question.
Conclusion 2: When exposed to the unintelligible suggestive programming then given access to the index of meanings, the subjects experienced frustration and an unwillingness to preform the suggested action. The procedure was altered and a new language devised, The experiment repeated however this time the index was introduced as a regular suggestive program. Over the course of time the subjects saw gradual activation of programmed behaviors as the new language was becoming intuitively understood without unaltered subject awareness.
Conclusion 3:In regards to Procedure two the process of re exposure is more effective. During post exposure interviews all subjects stated "Drawing the commands from memory and hearing 'was' Way more powerful than hearing it alone"