by robindf1 » July 21st, 2014, 1:50 am
[quote="pczelda"][quote="robindf1"][quote="pczelda"]You may have come across as flaming to Danny at first, and I could feel it too indirectly, but since then it's gotten better and I do really respect your opinion.[/quote]
No. I never flamed. That's the problem. When you are so sensitive that you object to almost every little thing that people do, that's a problem. When other people try to talk to you about it but you ignore them and refuse to stop, that's not a problem that can be overcome.[/quote]
All due respect again, please notice what I said. I wasn't saying you flamed, nor was I trying to insinuate that you did, and I certainly didn't mean any offense. Ok so I did think you were flaming before when I gave my definition of flaming, not now, now I'm willing to concede that you weren't doing that. I was merely pointing out that Danny felt like you were flaming and it did seem like a flame to me at first because I could feel the anger.
[quote="robindf1"]When people call you out for nagging repeatedly while others do educate potential listeners without anyone caring, you're nagging. That's you. That's you creating an uncomfortable or less enjoyable environment in a place that should be all about that. This site is about warping your mind and changing yourself in erotic ways. It's all about doing fucked up things to yourself or enjoying other people doing the same, knowing that's what they're doing.[/quote]
Wait, me? What are you saying here exactly?
[quote="robindf1"]So...thanks, but no thanks. If you really wanted to help, you'd shoot me a link or two to a place like that.[/quote]
I'm not aware of any such links. I was really trying to be nice here with my last post, and I can't give you what I don't have or don't know. So you seem to be mad at me for some reason, and I wasn't trying to say anything against you or with any intent to offend, nor is that my intent below.
[quote="robindf1"][quote="danny1988"]Ok then yeh im sensitive ive said as much myself.
Right......... you do realise ive hardly posted on here lately?
I only started again when I saw someone listening to this file. Also its only been on this topic or something relating to this topi
c and or file.
The times you mentioned about me nagging about all the little things where when I was emotionally unstable because of this file! I dont care about any of the other files on this site bar this one anymore. I said this in another post o./\[url=(https?:\/\/[^\s\[]+):$uid\](.*?)\[\/url:$uid\]/i
I only post on this topic again when I see someone listening who is new, usually asking why they are listening and do they know what it does. Most people just listen and post and dont read all the pages on a topic...[/quote]
You have the freedom to say whatever you want. I have the freedom to say what I want. That's how this works. I'm not demanding that he do anything. I'm saying that I and others have found him overbearing at times, and I'd really like it if he stopped nagging.[/quote]
As I see here he's clearly stating that the nagging has been over. Why do you persist in picking at old war wounds? At best that just makes them bleed again. And he agreed with you on him being sensitive. So where's the argument?
[quote="robindf1"][quote="KIY"]It is between danny1988 and however is considering the file. No one else.[/quote]
Hey. Just between Danny and I, remember? That was what you said to me. Or maybe you're seeing the flaw to your argument here.[/quote]
I see he said it's between danny1988 and whoever is considering listening to the file, I don't see that he mentioned you. And I don't recall you being the one interested here. Therefore your point here is moot.
[quote="robindf1"][quote="KIY"]If you disagree with danny1998 about whether or not the file is dangerous, and someone else is considering it, you are free to post why you think he is wrong.
If this is going to useful, please add some new information to the discussion.[/quote]
You have the freedom to say whatever you want. I have the freedom to say what I want. That's how this works.[/quote]
I believe that's what he just said. It seems like you're taking what he said and rewriting it in your own words to repeat the thought and acting like it's your own idea. You speak of hypocrisy, whose feet are wearing the shoes of hypocrisy now?
[quote="robindf1"]Maybe you should take the advice of, "It's between those two people." and apply it to him and I. Don't be hypocritical, now.[/quote]
Why would he do that? From what I saw, Danny was quiet for a long time after the events you keep bringing up based on him nagging about everything, and just came back to post a friendly, thorough and educated warning to the interested person when you jumped in angry at him for stuff he wasn't even doing anymore. Seems like the problem here is a lack of forgiveness on your part. Also, once again you speak of hypocrisy, but that you jumped into something that could have been left between Danny/any other educators and the person interested in the file like has already been said, and then call hypocrisy that he's not saying you should be singled out alone with Danny? Aren't you being hypocritical yourself when you say that?
[quote="robindf1"]Does you telling me to stop while telling me to stop trying to get Danny to stop count? Eh, I'll count it.[/quote]
Yes you're right, it does matter. If this is you starting to see reason, th
ank you, I'm proud of you for starting to come around.[/quote]
1. No, the point is not moot. If you berate someone talking to someone else interjecting into a conversation between two peple by saying that the conversation is between those two people and to ignore them..do you not see the hypocrisy in butting him doing the same by butting into my conversation between Danny and I instead of ignoring my post?
2. Someone claiming the they've stopped doing something and someone having stopped is not the same thing. And forgiveness comes after an apology only. There's no remorse there. It was more, "I nag and I'm sensitive, but that's what I do." It's not the frequency that matters to me. Time-wise. It's the amount of his posts that boil down to that. How often he repeats himself in the same thread, how petty most of it is, and how people have talked to him about it before with him just shrugging his shoulders and not giving an inch.
Me saying, "If you believe that conversations between two people should solely be the business of those two people, then why did you butt into my conversation with someone else?" is not hypocrisy. I'm clearly open to responding to you, or anyone else who wants to talk to me. What I'm doing isn't demanding that no one speak to me. All I did was point out that he was breaking his own "rules", going against the advice he was giving me in the very post that he was giving me that advice in.
3. Rewriting someone's words to make a point is not hypocrisy. Surely I don't need to pull out my definition of that words as well? His words weren't even, "Everyone can say what they want." They were, "Those people can do whatever they want, and if you don't like it, don't say anything." That's why I said that if they were extended the right to speak, I had to be. Free speech is not a one way street, where you can say whatever you wish without criticism.
4. I did read what you said. You told me I was flaming, and then you continued to insinuate it. It's only now that you say, "Okay, now I admit that you weren't."...right after you accused me of not reading your posts where I can only assume you meant for me to pick up that you already admitted that somewhere. That makes no sense. Don't get on my case for not knowing what you said before you even told me.
The reason I'm annoyed is no real mystery. No one has read what I had to say before piping up as far as what I think in regards to education about files, you accused me of flaming for not agreeing with what Danny was doing, someone got on my case for speaking my mind at all while trumpeting free speech, and now you're snarking at me while wondering why I'm annoyed.
Can you maybe understand why this is getting heated now? If anyone listened to what I was saying, not what I insinuated or hinted at, but what I've said multiple times now, and didn't get on my ass for saying what I think at all, we wouldn't be in this situation right now. This...whole thing wouldn't be going on.