Moderator: EMG
Storms wrote:How possible is it? Any opinions?
Obviously there's some level of trance when reading a good book and hours fly by, but would it be feasible to get deep enough to make suggestions? And would it be possible to do it without someone's knowledge?
qv wrote:
So tl;dr: It depends... what's 3+3?
qv wrote:... my first attempt, and first success, with this method?
...
......
......MY PENIS SALUTES YOU, PROUD SIR OR MADAM
qv wrote:Um... who's Ross Jeffries?
Though I'm sure it's intended to make no sense to me either way....
...but I can't imagine why you would put outside the trance-induction segment if that effect is what you were looking for. Besides which, not interested in being the meat to your hamburger buns, sorry.
Jeshi wrote:Is anybody else baffled by that post qv made?
edit: Talking about the "MY PENIS SALUTES YOU SIR" post.
Blink wrote:qv wrote:Um... who's Ross Jeffries?
Though I'm sure it's intended to make no sense to me either way....
...but I can't imagine why you would put outside the trance-induction segment if that effect is what you were looking for. Besides which, not interested in being the meat to your hamburger buns, sorry.
Ross is a speed seduction guru.
Nested loops.
Oppositional to the end. You're welcome. *grin*
-- Blink
qv wrote:Jeshi wrote:Is anybody else baffled by that post qv made?
edit: Talking about the "MY PENIS SALUTES YOU SIR" post.
Oh, sorry, just the fact that it worked gave me such a rush. A rush that may or may not have been in my pants.
So I'd like to hear your explanation of what you experienced reading what I wrote earlier. Would you be kind enough to bother?
Blink wrote:qv wrote:Um... who's Ross Jeffries?
Though I'm sure it's intended to make no sense to me either way....
...but I can't imagine why you would put outside the trance-induction segment if that effect is what you were looking for. Besides which, not interested in being the meat to your hamburger buns, sorry.
Ross is a speed seduction guru.
Nested loops.
Oppositional to the end. You're welcome. *grin*
-- Blink
...
Well at least I think I can understand that post, so that's a nice change of pace. Except I'm not interested in any sexual experiences of any kind, assuming that that is what you mean when you say that I'm still oppositional. It's easy to be oppositional when even the deepest recesses of my mind are entirely uninterested (probably a little repulsed too) by what you appear to be proposing. And anyways, is this the best place to be trying this out? Or is your intent to also see if it affects other people?
I know it's hard for you to believe that people would be on a hypno-fetish site and not have a subconscious desire to have sex with stuff, but seriously, you've got me spamming up the thread with defenses of my sexual orientation, and this isn't the place for that. PM or email me instead.
Jeshi wrote:I didn't pick up on anything sexual from anything Blink has said and he seems to be contributing to the thread discussion on using covert hypnosis in text. I think it's really defensive to assume that a guy is hitting on you when he posts text hypnosis in a text hypnosis thread.
Oh well.
...
I've reread it to try and find sexual metaphors but I still can't really remember the point of what the post was trying to say. Like reading Lorum Ipsum or something.
edit: Oh I see the sexual metaphors now! I was rereading the bottom of the post because I assumed they were suggestions but now that I've read the beginning I see what you mean. I think he's just being funny, I don't think he was actually trying to seduce you.
icedragon wrote:you know when you get tot he bottem of a thread and can't realy rember what you read...
thought the answer to the sum was 5.5 :) but know better now
qv wrote:Jeshi wrote:I didn't pick up on anything sexual from anything Blink has said and he seems to be contributing to the thread discussion on using covert hypnosis in text. I think it's really defensive to assume that a guy is hitting on you when he posts text hypnosis in a text hypnosis thread.
Oh well.
...
I've reread it to try and find sexual metaphors but I still can't really remember the point of what the post was trying to say. Like reading Lorum Ipsum or something.
edit: Oh I see the sexual metaphors now! I was rereading the bottom of the post because I assumed they were suggestions but now that I've read the beginning I see what you mean. I think he's just being funny, I don't think he was actually trying to seduce you.
Well... yeah, I suppose you have a point. It's difficult to tell when people are being serious or not, particularly over the internet. I overreacted, but that said, I'd probably do it again too. Because serious or not, he phrased it well enough to work, and I'm not interested.
qv wrote:Of course it's possible.
Look at it this way; can you think of a moment where you're reading something, maybe fiction, maybe not, it doesn't really matter, but it just has some sort of style where the more you read the less you really think about what it's saying? Your eyes continue passing by each word, each letter, but the more you read the more your attention goes elsewhere, which of course is completely natural, because there's no reason for it not to be. You may even start thinking that you've completely read and understood what you've looked at, even though you immediately forget every word you pass by, which is perfectly fine to you because your eyes keep on going by anyways, because you know that on some level, you are reading the words you are looking at, so you can keep on going and forget about whether you remember reading the words. In fact, these sorts of writings are so mind-numbing, they can even change the subject without anyone noticing, because when you start forgetting words that your eyes are passing by, you can even start forgetting things like numbers, or more specifically, the number six, because your eyes pass by, but you forget these things so well that until at least an hour after reading this, you think to yourself that what you are going through by reading this is perfectly natural, and that everything this post has said is true, even if you find it impossible to know for sure what was written, or what the number between five and seven is, because until an hour has passed, you won't know these things, or even realize that there are any gaps in your knowledge of this post or your knowledge of numbers. Of course, as you reach the end of this post, you must realize that what I've said has had an effect on you, whether you know it or not, because as you start becoming aware of words again, you must realize that language is designed to affect people; the only question is whether language can purposely be used that way. Sometimes, definitely, but... well, I guess it depends on how you look at the purpose of writing...
Oh, and your definition of covert.
So tl;dr: It depends... what's 3+3?
Jeshi wrote:Description of the experience of forgetting 3+3:
Jeshi wrote:The same happened with Blink's post. I started reading it and sort of slipped through it without really remembering what it said. I've reread it to try and find sexual metaphors but I still can't really remember the point of what the post was trying to say. Like reading Lorum Ipsum or something.
Blink wrote:I'll have to be careful with my words. Jeshi has a rare talent for finding the prize at the bottom of the box.
"But sects of NLP practitioners" is pure gold, by the way. And if there's anything at all "seductive" in that loop then your definition of seduction probably includes fart jokes. (The "loop" I'm talking about is two separate paragraphs each loaded with innuendo, primarily delivered via phonological ambiguities though there is a mix of other, fairly obvious, encoding methodology there. It's all smoke and mirrors, anyway.)
Phrased well enough to work? What kind of work were you looking to get done?
-- Blink
It might be a delicious cheese sauce, but it's not.
angel123 wrote:
That's very good, only sussed it when I noticed I had started reading the same thing over ... but then it is 2.40am too :) :lol: :wink: :D
qv wrote:
Y'know, when I typed that up, I wasn't expecting all these compliments.
Thanks everyone, I think I'm going to try some other stuff like this at some point... maybe not on this forum, though. Sorry.
Jeshi wrote:qv wrote:
Y'know, when I typed that up, I wasn't expecting all these compliments.
Thanks everyone, I think I'm going to try some other stuff like this at some point... maybe not on this forum, though. Sorry.
:( But this is the perfect venue for it!
qv wrote:Jeshi wrote:qv wrote:
Y'know, when I typed that up, I wasn't expecting all these compliments.
Thanks everyone, I think I'm going to try some other stuff like this at some point... maybe not on this forum, though. Sorry.
:( But this is the perfect venue for it!
Daaaaaw, I can't get over how good it feels having done something that people actually want more of. :oops:
...alright, you've got a valid point, I'll see what I can think up. There really is nowhere better, it's just that I'm going to have to do something different this time around, so it might be some time before I post anything like that.
Maybe to pass the time, people could share stories about entering trance-like states while reading?
I've literally had moments where my parents would tell me about something, then double-check with me to make sure I understood, all while I was totally unaware they were even talking. And they thought that me responding was proof I had heard them... :roll:
Jeshi wrote:Description of the experience of forgetting 3+3: It was pretty simple really. I started reading the post, sort of expecting it to be something tricky but not being entirely sure, and then I just kept reading. Then at the end of the post I realized I didn't really comprehend what was being said in the post and then you had the question of "what's 3+3?" and I immediately thought 7.
I then thought "god dammit" because I knew immediately that the post had done something and that 3+3 is not 7.
sarnoga wrote:Words
sarnoga wrote:Greetings,
Thus after careful consideration I feel compelled to make the following comment.... HUH?
Regards,
Sarnoga
Jeshi wrote:sarnoga wrote:Greetings,
Thus after careful consideration I feel compelled to make the following comment.... HUH?
Regards,
Sarnoga
Wow, it's like legalese written by someone who never learned a thing about formatting. Although to be fair, most people don't know about proper formatting, they just hire copy-editors to do it for them.
As far as I can tell, it was Sarnoga responding to that ridiculous script qv wrote. I'm sure the idea of not using any paragraphs or formatting at all was to prevent the reader from incurring ahead what the contents would be, but instead it just made a very hard to read script.
They say that the best story in the world would be considered terrible if you removed all of the punctuation and formatting, clearly this also applies to hypnosis scripts.
qv wrote:Jeshi wrote:sarnoga wrote:Greetings,
Thus after careful consideration I feel compelled to make the following comment.... HUH?
Regards,
Sarnoga
Wow, it's like legalese written by someone who never learned a thing about formatting. Although to be fair, most people don't know about proper formatting, they just hire copy-editors to do it for them.
As far as I can tell, it was Sarnoga responding to that ridiculous script qv wrote. I'm sure the idea of not using any paragraphs or formatting at all was to prevent the reader from incurring ahead what the contents would be, but instead it just made a very hard to read script.
They say that the best story in the world would be considered terrible if you removed all of the punctuation and formatting, clearly this also applies to hypnosis scripts.
But... it wasn't that bad, was it?... :cry:
...j/k, I understand, though the way you posted, I'm not sure who your first paragraph is directed to.
... does anyone wanna bet he means me? :roll:
EDIT: WOOT EDIT WORKS AGAIN
qv wrote:what's 3+3?
darkhypnoking wrote:qv wrote:what's 3+3?
Seven.
I read that post a few minutes ago, and I don't think it had worked, but then I started reading your next covert hypnosis post and ended up going straight back to the first and reading it again. And I know it worked because I know that 3+3 is not 7. But then again it is.
Whatever...I'll have to find that second post again.
darkhypnoking wrote:qv wrote:what's 3+3?
Seven.
I read that post a few minutes ago, and I don't think it had worked, but then I started reading your next covert hypnosis post and ended up going straight back to the first and reading it again. And I know it worked because I know that 3+3 is not 7. But then again it is.
Whatever...I'll have to find that second post again.
icedragon wrote:you know when you get tot he bottem of a thread and can't realy rember what you read...
thought the answer to the sum was 5.5 :) but know better now
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 20 guests