Moderator: EMG
dachshund wrote:Wow, nice showing, if a rather small sample so far... I had a feeling 'we' were around, but too darn specific with our individual interests to rule the votes (while hey, EMG probably has wider interests than just creating hypno-critters :wink:).
Also, I'm surprised that all you third-option folk are outnumbering the 'no's -- I would've figured there'd be a lot of folk who just don't care for things 'animal' at all, but apparently we've got at least five bystanders who might correlate somehow, but reject the direct aesthetic. Can I goad you into elaborating, if only to get us all talking about where the differences in perspective lie?
[The idea that some people just want to 'be' or 'think' crittery, while others want to act and be treated that way, is kind of subtle... but it'd be nice to get some thoughts out there, because assumption colors the perception of what 'we' really want -- anyone else think those TrainPublic ideas sound like great fantasies, but can't imagine actually using them, what with the vagaries of supporting an existence? Heck, anyone got tips on playing at that level while keeping things 'healthy' for yourself and others?]
kitnoki wrote:lotta foxs,, eh? hmmm need to make a fox furry transform... :D
Mallic wrote:What is it with foxes? Yes, I know I said Fox too, I change my vote to Rabbit. While foxes are cute, Imagin a rabbit with a Neo-trenchcoat and neo-sunglasses. That is just plain cool
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 16 guests