Is it right or is it wrong?
Posted: August 21st, 2006, 10:28 pm
I need some backup on something I read recently online, but don't exactly have a fully credible source for. After all, if you believe everything you read online, you're gonna be one confused li'l puppy.
So, here is what I read, and what I would like feedback on. Also, any links that are reliably credible sources would be nice, if any of you can think of some.
Any confirmations, denials, or links to support or disprove this?
So, here is what I read, and what I would like feedback on. Also, any links that are reliably credible sources would be nice, if any of you can think of some.
Many years ago, in a study on human sexuality, researchers looked at the relationship between sexual arousal and brain-wave activity, and things like erogenous zones. Using heat-sensitive cameras to film an aroused couple involved the act of intimacy, one could clearly see what parts of the body were getting hotter than others. In this study electrodes were attached to both men and women to measure their brain-wave activity during sexual intercourse.
What they discovered was that in men, during foreplay, intercourse and climax, there was a progression in the brain activity from a normal state to what they called an "animalistic" state - in other words, the brain functions regressed to a lower level in all the men tested. Not only that, but that for each man tested, they sunk to approximately the same level of brain wave activity during climax and immediately after. There was a "floor" of sorts, and it was consistent, regardless of any variations in the sexual encounters.
But listen to what happened to the woman. This is the really good part. Women are exactly the opposite of this! The brain activity, or "state of being", as they put it, progressed upwards from normal to a much higher state. Not only that, but there was also no measurable limit to how high that state could climb.
Any confirmations, denials, or links to support or disprove this?