by jnorcros » November 2nd, 2006, 5:03 pm
I am not trying to hype herbal versus chemical soarces. What I suggested was in direct response to the original question. Below is an example of the type of input you get from the site I suggested. I am a senior engineer in the communications field and believe me I recognize marketing hype.
Janice Marie
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Question
"I read on another site today that herbal hormones prevent drug hormones from working properly if taken together. Any truth in that statemment?
response
There is an insane level of mythology that gets repeated over and over, copied from website to website, about herbal things.
And those bits of mythology are strengthened by a medical community
which has historically ignored the role of nutrition -- food, plants and berries -- in managing health and in healing and in creating physical changes in the human body.
All of this is analogous to people who routinely use nicotine and alcohol,
then making grandeous statements about how bad marijuana is for the human body and mind. (disclaimer: I personally do not use any of these, never have)
When people worship drugs/chemicals for any use, they will fight against anything that is different from drugs. For example, the natural forms of sugar are listed as "bad" to consume, so for example we are given Splenda -- sugar molecules which are modified by the addition of two chlorine molecules, despite chlorine being deadly to the human body...
..we are given aspartame, (the sweetner in most Diet soda pop, etc) which is an addicitve chemical and a mind altering drug, repeatedly rejected by the FDA for human consumption until Donald Rumsfield forced approval for it via "back-door" deal making...
"Out there" in the world of free exchange of ideas and beliefs, there is a total disregard for independent verification of facts. For example, there are things called xenoestrogens ://www.answers.com/topic/xenoestrogen which are indeed endrocrine disruptors, also sometimes called psuedo estrogens.
But in marketplace of ideas, these substances have become confused with, and linked to, phytoestrogen. psuedo estrogens/xenoestrogens block cellular hormone receptor sites. Phytoestrogens feed those sites.
Even the term phytoestrogen has become tainted with modifiers, such as calling them "weak estrogen", when there is never any other explanation as to the difference between "weak" and "normal" estrogen. Bear in mind that the hundreds of different types of hormone molecules which the human body makes and uses, are all just "keys" which open the "door locks" within various human cells, so that the individual cells can receive nourishment and "do their thing".
Some cells need very specific "keys" to be inserted into their "locks" in order to open, some cells are master keyed and many different hormone "keys" can open them. This is for example, why breast cells do not function much under the influence of testosterone --
testosterone molecules are the wrong "key" for breast cell "locks"....
and breast cells multiply when there are elevated levels of estrogen available. A key made of plastic can still open a home's door lock, as easily as a key made of brass... so "weak estrogen" is a strange bit of terminology.
The proof is in the results, however. There is no doubt that herbal-based estrogens can femininze a body, when used properly. And THIS is where the problems arise. Over the past fifty years of T'Gender history, many people have gone to herbal shops, Vitamin Cottage, etc., and purchased bottles of estrogenic herbs to try to feminize themselves. And in virtually every case, nothing was taken to first suppress testosterone. Even near-lethal dosages of drug estrogens will not feminize a body until testosterone production is suppressed. Eventually, after several months to a year or more on pure drug/chemical estrogen, testosterone production can be overcome, but this is the dirty secret of drug estrogen users -- that initial results may take more time than believed... and many could make the statement that "drugs don't work" if they used the same standards for results as people who believe that "herbs don't work".
There is also the issue of quantity and insufficient information:
Many people think that taking 500mg daily of Dong Quai, for example, should bring feminization. Many people believe that Dong Quai *IS* estrogen.But when that usage does not bring immediate results,
they do not say that Dong Quai alone did not work for themselves, they say "I tried herbs and herbs didn't work".
Evanesce and Feminol are vastly different from just bottles of store herbs. These are formulated from extracts of the active ingredients of the various estrogenic -- estrogen resource -- herbs and berries,
which are formulated and concentrated in specific ratios determined by German research to bring the most synergystic potency from each ingrediant; i.e, "this" herb combines to make "that" herb work better, etc
And Evanesce and Feminol also contain ingrediants to suppress testosterone production.
Finally, many people do take Evanesce along with drug hormones, because of its testosterone blocking capability;they feel that the drug hormones work better and more quickly in this combination.
We have 16+ years of worldwide experience to prove that properly formulated herbal mixtures DO work effectively, especially when taken properly.
Personally, I prefer years of proven results over esoteric theories, any day.
Guess you can't figure out who you are until you accept who you might be!..... Luke in "Zerophilia" (Director's Cut)