Moderator: EMG
Mallic wrote:A mule? I cold understand a horse or maybe camel but mules have no redeming features
AshTR wrote:I don't know why...but i'd rather be a cat. (Seems like i'm the only guy who'd rather be a cat.)
goldragon_70 wrote:no they have been considered a furry for a while. Maybe because there is alot of people that like dragons. This is why I'm not sure if merpeople are furries.
Shaderone wrote:goldragon_70 wrote:no they have been considered a furry for a while. Maybe because there is alot of people that like dragons. This is why I'm not sure if merpeople are furries.
Merpeople are, in fact, furries. The correct definition of furry is "humanoid-formed creatures with animal faces, fur/scale/feathers/whatever, and often appropriate tails, wings, claws, etc., able to speak, and with a human-like personality, though quite often with "quirks" hinting at the real-life animal upon which the character is based". Understanding the fact that the word 'furry' does not mean it must have fur, amphibians, mythical creatures, and other scaled creatures may be furries. Of course, the original 'Homo Sapien' has been regarded as perhaps the first furry to walk the earth.
Also, I'm not sure where this source is from, it may not be reliable, but apparently there's a difference between 'anthro' and 'furry'. Furries are more human, while anthros are more animal. Can anyone confirm that?
KatieFox wrote:Anthro is the term that applies to most Furries fursona's, AKA Animal with human charectaristics.
Furry applies to the fandom and the culture, nothing to do with the fursonas.
maxxcarswell wrote:Wolf!
Return to Furry Transformations
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 20 guests