Moderator: EMG
DianaW wrote:While I would prefer a female to trigger me (as I don't want to kinda do any kind of sexual stuff<snip>
Diana, lemme back up a minute and say that I'm going to revise the tone of my previous post. If I seemed snippy, that wasn't really my intent. It seems to me that you have several issues combined here under a single heading. Please bear with me while I respond to each.DianaW wrote:On the nature of hypnosis....
Don't apologize. Such is the nature of all human endeavor. Most of us are still waiting for the evolution bus to pull up. This isn't so much an issue of hypnosis, or this site, as it is an issue of human nature. (There's also been research that shows that the perceived anonymity of the Internet brings out the worst in all of us. It's similar to road rage, where the presence of a sheet of safety glass seems do completely divorce us from the social norms we embrace when we're face-to-face with people.)DianaW wrote:A lot of people on here don't have a clue. Sorry EMG to say that about a lot of the clientelle but let me give you an idea of what I mean.
Here's where I poked you last time. I need to explain what I meant. You're expressing a gender bias in this statement. Admittedly, your biases are shared by many others and are probably fact-based, but don't believe that your generalizations* are immutable truth. Not for a minute.DianaW wrote:There is a reason I asked for a female trigger... Which I did not get... Two people who both contacted me were male... I am sickened to say that the first thing anyone wants it seems is me to send them my picture.
While I don't question your reasons, I am going to take this opportunity to repeat some general safety information.DianaW wrote:went along with for a reason...
That certainly starts things out with a "stalkery" flavor. I'm a dominant sadist with a penchant for mind control. The bozos who open up with "ASL? Pic?" or treat people abusively in the guise of being dominant are peeing in my (applicant) pool. This does not a happy Blink make. Still, with great reluctance, I recognize my own limits. The best I can do is spread some safety information and hope for the best.DianaW wrote:One of the two people who contacted me wanted: My name, age, sex, a photo, and my primary e-mail addy...
Here's the part that's hardest to write and hardest to read, I'm sure. People suck. All people. Everywhere. There are mindless exploiters who don't care about your reasons or your safety or your limits or your wishes. These people are right here among us, right now. They're reading along. Laughing, probably. If you listen to the file that opens you up to being commanded by anyone who knows the secret, and you shout the secret to the world, then you are going to be the subject of masturbatory fantasy, at least. I hope masturbatory fantasy is the worst of it.DianaW wrote:There is a REASON I had a seperate e-mail account for just this kind of thing. <snip> The second person talking to me turned from what looked like innocent experimentation into something that really struck a nerve with me and luckily snapped me out of it. <snip> I am not a source for your masterbation material.
Kalendaine wrote:But if there were only 50 (genuine) guys on the internet, and one announces that he's available, would you not be intrigued?
Just a thought.
whatthe75 wrote:Isn't that similar to the line "Trust me"
ANy man that says he is decent or trust me is surely not. And only a man that said he isnt would be.
Dont trust me.
But i said the words trust me in that sentence so that means you cant trust me.
mat2blue wrote:whatthe75 wrote:Isn't that similar to the line "Trust me"
ANy man that says he is decent or trust me is surely not. And only a man that said he isnt would be.
Dont trust me.
But i said the words trust me in that sentence so that means you cant trust me.
i'm sort of offended!
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], naughtywish14, watman and 124 guests