is 70% of everybody really pansexual

[kunoichi]

I have a dumb but interesting question and it has to do with the nature of humans. Basically I have been fallowing different erotic hypnosis sites for about ten years and have only come to one conclusions. About 70% of everybody are pansexual but only a small percent know it. Know follow my logic here{in other wirds it’s not science but it’s an observation. Basically each serotic hypnosis site clams are different but they come down to the following.
1. Ninty percent of people can be hipnotiesed.{gibve or take that the numbers very but thewre idea is that most people are hipnotisable.}
2. A lot claim they can change your sexual orientation and have forums full of people claiming that they have done so.{again thizs is just an observation it’s not science}
3. Lastly they claim that if you don’t” agree with the hypnosis”
or “it’s not in youre nature” tehen the affects wont happen.
4. a good bit peopel I know say that bisexuals are really pansexuals and judst think there are just two choices.

btw. a definition of pansexual. a pansexual like boys, girls, or inbetween not to mention crossdreessers. oingfact if iyt's human and it's hot and alive then you can have realtation of any kind with it. I know I'm pansexual.

p.sp i was just curious and fising for oppinoin.

[Jeshi]

Holy shit how can you possibly have so many typos.

It's very wishful thinking to believe that 70% of people are pansexual. However, if it were the case, we certainly wouldn't have such a stigma against same-sex relations.

The truth is, people who listen to files that change their sexual orientation are only people who are gay or bisexual and want to use hypnosis to come to terms with it. With the bisexuals, their either end up being gay because of hypnosis, or they end up admitting they like the same-sex but also admitting that they still like the opposite-sex.

There are sometimes people who are 100% straight who listen to those files and it doesn't work. But if it doesn't work, they don't see a need to talk about it on the internet. What kind of a story is "I tried something once and nothing happened"? People only feel the need to talk extensively about something if it is impressive.

It's probably true that there are many straight people who are really bisexual but don't bother to recognize it, but the majority of people in the world are still straight. Science backs this up, as the reason behind people being straight or gay or bi is based on a specific portion of the brain that determines what the person finds attractive in a mate. By default, that part of the brain likes men. If there is a Y chromosome, then it is changed to like women. Many things can happen though that interrupt the process, resulting in people whose bodies and brains were made to be men but without their brains being changed to like women, so that they are men who like men. Or, it can make the desire for women, but get stopped before it removes the desire for men, making a bisexual. With lesbians, the process is the opposite. Despite most of the body progressing typically, somehow additional testosterone is released and the part of the brain that decides desirable mates is changed to like women. However, with women there are other factors too, as malfunctions of the ovulation cycle can result in changes in sexuality as well.

As much as it would please me if 70% of people were pansexual, it simply isn't true. Too many statistical anomalies would have to happen for it to be the case.

Personally, I hate the term pansexual. It presumes that bisexual people wouldn't want to date people outside the gender binary, or that they aren't even aware that such people exist. The truth is that most bisexuals use the term because everybody knows what it means, and doesn't carry the same sense of smug superiority that people associate with the term pansexual.

The truth is, the chance of meeting somebody who falls outside the gender binary in a sexual situation is <1%. In such rare circumstances, I believe most people do not consider what label they use to define their sexuality. They would be considered on an individual basis, "do I find this person attractive?" without making the earlier judgement of "Oh, is that a man? Is that an attractive man?"

I don't think anybody would meet an intersexed person, and say "Well, you are incredibly attractive, but I identify as bisexual so I won't have sex with you."

[bandler]

My 2 cents on this topic:

Everybody has masculine and feminine inside them. One's culture allows the expression of a subset of what is possible. Some cultures allow men to have sex with boys for fun and women for reproduction. Some cultures preach all sex is sinful and should only be tolerated for reproduction, while the preachers are buttfucking every little boy they can get their hands on.

People say what they must in public to survive in their culture.

What people do behind closed doors is amazing, and unrelated to what they say they do.

As more people wake up to the reality that they can do what they like, they do.

So I think the majority of people are very flexible in what they would do sexually IF they could be certain their culture would not punish them for it.

Young attractive people have always been objects of desire because we humans are animals (whether we admit it or not) and we follow certain instinctive behaviors.

[kunoichi]

thanx you two... it's very interesting the two answers give me different perspectives to think on and they are appreciated+ so let me think on these two and I 'll try to get ack to you.