Moderator: EMG
Samz wrote:Launch wrote:Whatever you say, but I'm living proof.
And there are hundreds of others who are living proof.
wow you can read minds, must make playing poker very profitable! :D
Launch wrote:
Everything is madefrom the same things deep down.
Samz wrote:
Oh dear lord, are we in the 21st Century or the 15th....
inuyasha10121 wrote:Has anyone had success with the "unlock telepathy"files?everyone said i was stupid when i said that i found a mp3 that could give you telepathy so i wana see if they had the grounds to say that or if im right...i do so hope that im right
Dog wrote:inuyasha10121 wrote:Has anyone had success with the "unlock telepathy"files?everyone said i was stupid when i said that i found a mp3 that could give you telepathy so i wana see if they had the grounds to say that or if im right...i do so hope that im right
If it works you will know and so will other users, they will stop posting here and "talk among themselves"
:D
BobbyS wrote:If there really were hundreds of people who could practice telepathy they would have proved the existence of it by now to end the debate. It's as simple as that surely.
Launch wrote:Every part of our bodies is composed of certain subatomic particles.
Countless particles go into evern one cell.
When we go to move our arm or clench our fis our brain sends signals trough our nerves down to move whatever part of our body we chose to move.
Nerves like all things are made from these sub atomic particles.
As is air, grass, stone absolutly everything.
So if we can send these signals trough nerves sending them to another object in order to move it is the same.
The ratio of particles is different in everything but still it is an explination.
That is my therey on telekinesis, I presume that telepthy is on the same princible.
fringlinin1 wrote:By far one of the most interesting descriptions/theories I've seen. It sounds incredibly draining to use telekinesis, if said theory is how it works. All those particles - smaller than electrons - that normally circulate through you are now leaving you to act on another thing... unless it's a circuit, where they return to you after acting.
On a strange level, it does make sense. We have long known that matter can be converted to energy and vice-versa... mostly because energy IS matter - at it's smallest level. So yes, perhaps you can direct these energies at something other than muscle tissue. They do say that we use but 10 percent of our brain. I guess it would take some really open-minded open-ended learning to discover how to learn and grasp such an ability. Think how when you were born, you couldn't even control your arms. You tried to mimic others' actions until you got a memory of what thought in your brain causes what muscle to move. Is it possible even in the slightest, that we all have much more capacity, but haven't tapped it, simply because we missed out on learning it when our learning curve was highest, simply due to the fact that there was no mentor for it?
Perhaps it's my hopeful brain rationalizing the irrational, but the more I think about it scientifically, the less proof against it there is... (NOTE: there is also no proof FOR it either, but with both sides empty for proof, well, anything is possible)
I suppose I shall leave my state of belief on this topic at the same point as I do with religion: Agnostic
I'm only human, not omniscient. There are things I don't know. I'm smart enough to admit I don't know, and I'm not going to blindly assume one way or the other. I'll believe what I see. I won't say "there is" if I can't prove it, and I won't say "impossible" if I can't disprove it.
One of the smartest quotes of all was in a movie, of all things
"Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence". Could be I misquoted... maybe it was synonyms of those words... but that's the idea.
And now I leave you to ponder yet another great quandary:
"Motherf*cking snakes on a motherf*cking plane!"
Go on, noodle it.
Khaz wrote:Someone prove it to me. Come on, read my mind. All someone has to do is SHOW me, demonstrate this to me, and I'll believe it.
Nobody has ever taken me up on that, no matter how much they claim to be capable of it, save one person. And he's not exactly proof, just hit on a coincidence or two.
Jeez, can't you at least be open minded about the topic? I've read alot of books on telepathy. My theory is that there is a part of our brain we don't use. And if we do, it's by accident. This may be why we sometimes "see through" a person's lie and see the truth, or can sometimes predict the future in a dream, or in daily life. That part of the brain is often mistaken for the "third eye". I'm not sure about how it can manipulate unanimate objects, but I believe that electrons can exchange from people's brains, thus exchanging thoughts.Samz wrote:Oh dear lord, are we in the 21st Century or the 15th.... :roll:
Yes, but those chemicals start with electrical energy. Electrodes do travel through the brain and the body, for example "Restless leg syndrome", a 10 second long exitement of electrodes traveling through a leg.FlameD wrote:No. No it doesn't.
The whole "we only use 10% of our brains" is a myth. It's false. You don't constantly use the same 10% all the time, and the other 90% is never used and has amazing superpowers.
It's like your muscles. You aren't always using all your muscles. If you're sitting at your computer, there are quite a lot of muscles you aren't using at the moment. But you can use them, if you do something else, like exercise or jog.
It's the same with your brain. If you do one activity, you're using one section of your brain. If you do something else, you're using another section. But everyone uses ALL of their brain at some point. 100%.
And telepathy itself is highly improbable. The brain sends CHEMICAL signals through the body via the nerves. And the chemical signals through the nerves are self-contained. You can't "read" them from outside; there's nothing to read. It's not like you leak chemicals every time you think.
Not to mention that, even IF you could read someone's mind from a distance, you wouldn't understand it. Everyone thinks in a different pattern. It's not like reading a book. Each person has a different thought pattern that would need to be understood and deciphered in order to understand anything they're thinking.
And telepathy itself is highly improbable. The brain sends CHEMICAL signals through the body via the nerves. And the chemical signals through the nerves are self-contained. You can't "read" them from outside; there's nothing to read. It's not like you leak chemicals every time you think.
everworlder wrote:This has been a public service announcement from REALITY
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 173 guests